This topic contains 11 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  sadock 7 years, 9 months ago.

Willing to wear the stupid hat on this one

  • The real question is whether I’d actually enjoy it or if I’m using reverse psychology…..

    ________________________________________________

    [flickr-photo:id=3274749401,size=m]

    A life vacant of laughter is not worth exerting the effort it takes to live it.

    Before I get my gorgeous, personalized copies of “The Starter”

    But I kind of thought the same thing as Rohi and athanas… I do remember about the no-trade, no pay increase thing that sadock mentioned too.

    Why yes, apples. How did you know? [flickr-photo:id=4347154616] Pusher and member of the Gutter Sistren

    If we think you’re going to enjoy it – what’s in it for us?

    ___________________________

    Proud member of the Gutter Sistren

    I remember something like that as well. just wondering if there was a change in the hard cover that I missed, regarding this topic.

    _______________________________________________

    [flickr-photo:id=3718433600,size=m][flickr-photo:id=3725895360,size=m]

    That’d be awesome! Tongue out

    ________________________________________________

    [flickr-photo:id=3274749401,size=m]

    A life vacant of laughter is not worth exerting the effort it takes to live it.

    …they can smack you around from mtiple angles Saddock!

    ________________________________________________

    [flickr-photo:id=3274749401,size=m]

    A life vacant of laughter is not worth exerting the effort it takes to live it.

    the same answer as below … but I guess your position is all relative!

    …..unless I’m totally misremembering.

    ________________________________________________

    [flickr-photo:id=3274749401,size=m]

    A life vacant of laughter is not worth exerting the effort it takes to live it.

    Then realised that you had already said it UV which only leaves me with the requirement to concur. ..

    I concur!

    I don’t recall there being any team immunity mentioned in the Rookie. It was mentioned that the year a tier 2 team moves to Tier 1 that the players become protected and can’t be snatched up by other tier 1 league teams. Is this perhaps what you are thinking of?

    So, I’m a wee bit confused (shocking, I know).

    I had it in my head that the team that made it from Tier 2 down to Tier 1 was exempt from getting bounced back to Tier 2 their first year in the big leagues, but it appears that it’s not being promoted that way in press for The Starter.

    Is my head up on my arse on this one?

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.